Monday, April 06, 2009

who are these people and why did the police not arrest them?

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Read what Craig wrote, the bit towards the ened where he mentions the isolated group of violent young men. Then go to this analysis of the first picture of the guy chucking something through the windows of RBS. Finally, check out this.

I'd also like to pull Craig up on a point of conspiracy: He implies that the FIT pig in this picture was pre-positioned inside RBS to catch the incident on camera. There is no evidence to suggest that this was the case and it is wrong of him to imply that it is.

So, why didn't the thousands of police detain this violent group and instead concentrate on charging peaceful protests and murdering innocent bystanders? With the oodles of press photographs documenting the protests I imagine it will be particularly straightforward to identify these men and provide sufficient evidence of their violent conduct to charge them.

2 comments:

  1. There is no evidence to suggest that this was the case and it is wrong of him to imply that it is.

    I don't understand. Did the police then have a video camera behind every window to be sure of recording any which were broken, or was it just an astonishing but innocent coincidence that a camera was positioned behind the window which was broken? I think Craig's conclusion - it was conspiracy- stands.

    ReplyDelete
  2. There's nothing to show that the photo of the FIT pig was taken immediately after the window had been broken. Do you know of evidence to show it was?

    ReplyDelete

Feel free to share your opinions of my opinions. Oh- and cocking fuckmouse.